Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1161 to 1180 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that the final assessment order passed under section 144B is invalid due to non-service of the mandatory Show Cause Notice proposing variation to the returned income. The Respondents admitted the Show Cause Notice was sent to an incorrect email ID not provided by the Petitioner, resulting in failure of proper service. Consequently, the impugned assessment order dated 10.03.2024 was quashed and set aside. The matter was remanded to the NFAC at the stage of issuing the Show Cause Notice, directing the Respondents to provide the Petitioner with a proper link to upload his response. The Petitioner is entitled to file a response and be granted a personal hearing before the final assessment order is passed in compliance with section 144B within 12 weeks. The final order must be reasoned and address all submissions of the Petitioner. The writ petition was disposed accordingly.
The HC held that the final assessment order passed under section 144B is invalid due to non-service of the mandatory Show Cause Notice proposing variation to the returned income. The Respondents admitted the Show Cause Notice was sent to an incorrect email ID not provided by the Petitioner, resulting in failure of proper service. Consequently, the impugned assessment order dated 10.03.2024 was quashed and set aside. The matter was remanded to the NFAC at the stage of issuing the Show Cause Notice, directing the Respondents to provide the Petitioner with a proper link to upload his response. The Petitioner is entitled to file a response and be granted a personal hearing before the final assessment order is passed in compliance with section 144B within 12 weeks. The final order must be reasoned and address all submissions of the Petitioner. The writ petition was disposed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
