Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The ITAT held that adjustments under section 143(1)(a) must be preceded by proper intimation to the assessee, either in writing or electronically, as mandated by the first proviso to section 143(1)(a). In the present case, the assessee was not given any such notice before the CPC made adjustments disallowing the exemption under section 10(10AA)(ii) exceeding Rs. 3 lakhs, based on an invalid Gazette Notification. The Tribunal found this procedural lapse fatal to the validity of the adjustments. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned adjustments were set aside for non-compliance with the statutory requirement of prior intimation.
The ITAT held that adjustments under section 143(1)(a) must be preceded by proper intimation to the assessee, either in writing or electronically, as mandated by the first proviso to section 143(1)(a). In the present case, the assessee was not given any such notice before the CPC made adjustments disallowing the exemption under section 10(10AA)(ii) exceeding Rs. 3 lakhs, based on an invalid Gazette Notification. The Tribunal found this procedural lapse fatal to the validity of the adjustments. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned adjustments were set aside for non-compliance with the statutory requirement of prior intimation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
