Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
The ITAT held that adjustments under section 143(1)(a) must be preceded by proper intimation to the assessee, either in writing or electronically, as mandated by the first proviso to section 143(1)(a). In the present case, the assessee was not given any such notice before the CPC made adjustments disallowing the exemption under section 10(10AA)(ii) exceeding Rs. 3 lakhs, based on an invalid Gazette Notification. The Tribunal found this procedural lapse fatal to the validity of the adjustments. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned adjustments were set aside for non-compliance with the statutory requirement of prior intimation.
The ITAT held that adjustments under section 143(1)(a) must be preceded by proper intimation to the assessee, either in writing or electronically, as mandated by the first proviso to section 143(1)(a). In the present case, the assessee was not given any such notice before the CPC made adjustments disallowing the exemption under section 10(10AA)(ii) exceeding Rs. 3 lakhs, based on an invalid Gazette Notification. The Tribunal found this procedural lapse fatal to the validity of the adjustments. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned adjustments were set aside for non-compliance with the statutory requirement of prior intimation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
