Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The ITAT held that adjustments under section 143(1)(a) must be preceded by proper intimation to the assessee, either in writing or electronically, as mandated by the first proviso to section 143(1)(a). In the present case, the assessee was not given any such notice before the CPC made adjustments disallowing the exemption under section 10(10AA)(ii) exceeding Rs. 3 lakhs, based on an invalid Gazette Notification. The Tribunal found this procedural lapse fatal to the validity of the adjustments. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned adjustments were set aside for non-compliance with the statutory requirement of prior intimation.
The ITAT held that adjustments under section 143(1)(a) must be preceded by proper intimation to the assessee, either in writing or electronically, as mandated by the first proviso to section 143(1)(a). In the present case, the assessee was not given any such notice before the CPC made adjustments disallowing the exemption under section 10(10AA)(ii) exceeding Rs. 3 lakhs, based on an invalid Gazette Notification. The Tribunal found this procedural lapse fatal to the validity of the adjustments. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned adjustments were set aside for non-compliance with the statutory requirement of prior intimation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
