Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT directed the AO to treat the excess consideration paid in slump sale transactions as goodwill and allow depreciation accordingly, following a coordinate bench's precedent. The tribunal allowed the set-off of brought forward unabsorbed depreciation, distinguishing it from business loss. Transfer Pricing adjustments on AMP expenses were disallowed due to lack of evidence of association or statutory basis for the Bright Line Test. The tribunal directed inclusion of Satyatej Commercial Co. Ltd. as a comparable for import of finished goods transactions, excluding freight costs. It also ordered exclusion of Hand Innovations Inc. and RG Medical Diagnostics for benchmarking indenting commission transactions based on product and territorial similarity. The tribunal held that reimbursement of expenses could not be valued at nil without independent comparable evidence and disallowed the TPO's and DRP's treatment, allowing the related appeal ground. All contested grounds raised by the assessee were allowed accordingly.
The ITAT directed the AO to treat the excess consideration paid in slump sale transactions as goodwill and allow depreciation accordingly, following a coordinate bench's precedent. The tribunal allowed the set-off of brought forward unabsorbed depreciation, distinguishing it from business loss. Transfer Pricing adjustments on AMP expenses were disallowed due to lack of evidence of association or statutory basis for the Bright Line Test. The tribunal directed inclusion of Satyatej Commercial Co. Ltd. as a comparable for import of finished goods transactions, excluding freight costs. It also ordered exclusion of Hand Innovations Inc. and RG Medical Diagnostics for benchmarking indenting commission transactions based on product and territorial similarity. The tribunal held that reimbursement of expenses could not be valued at nil without independent comparable evidence and disallowed the TPO's and DRP's treatment, allowing the related appeal ground. All contested grounds raised by the assessee were allowed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
