Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The ITAT directed the AO to treat the excess consideration paid in slump sale transactions as goodwill and allow depreciation accordingly, following a coordinate bench's precedent. The tribunal allowed the set-off of brought forward unabsorbed depreciation, distinguishing it from business loss. Transfer Pricing adjustments on AMP expenses were disallowed due to lack of evidence of association or statutory basis for the Bright Line Test. The tribunal directed inclusion of Satyatej Commercial Co. Ltd. as a comparable for import of finished goods transactions, excluding freight costs. It also ordered exclusion of Hand Innovations Inc. and RG Medical Diagnostics for benchmarking indenting commission transactions based on product and territorial similarity. The tribunal held that reimbursement of expenses could not be valued at nil without independent comparable evidence and disallowed the TPO's and DRP's treatment, allowing the related appeal ground. All contested grounds raised by the assessee were allowed accordingly.
The ITAT directed the AO to treat the excess consideration paid in slump sale transactions as goodwill and allow depreciation accordingly, following a coordinate bench's precedent. The tribunal allowed the set-off of brought forward unabsorbed depreciation, distinguishing it from business loss. Transfer Pricing adjustments on AMP expenses were disallowed due to lack of evidence of association or statutory basis for the Bright Line Test. The tribunal directed inclusion of Satyatej Commercial Co. Ltd. as a comparable for import of finished goods transactions, excluding freight costs. It also ordered exclusion of Hand Innovations Inc. and RG Medical Diagnostics for benchmarking indenting commission transactions based on product and territorial similarity. The tribunal held that reimbursement of expenses could not be valued at nil without independent comparable evidence and disallowed the TPO's and DRP's treatment, allowing the related appeal ground. All contested grounds raised by the assessee were allowed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
