Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal against the AO's addition on account of bogus purchases. While the AO added 25% of turnover as gross profit, the CIT(A) restricted the addition to 2.46%, reflecting the assessee's declared average gross profit over AYs 2020-21 to 2022-23. The Tribunal found that despite the purchases being non-genuine, the declared sales were undisputed and necessary to achieve turnover. Considering precedents where additions for bogus purchases approximate 5% GP, the CIT(A)'s imposition of 2.46% addition was reasonable and proportionate. Consequently, the ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s findings and dismissed the Revenue's appeal, confirming the limited addition to the assessee's income under the impugned assessment years.
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal against the AO's addition on account of bogus purchases. While the AO added 25% of turnover as gross profit, the CIT(A) restricted the addition to 2.46%, reflecting the assessee's declared average gross profit over AYs 2020-21 to 2022-23. The Tribunal found that despite the purchases being non-genuine, the declared sales were undisputed and necessary to achieve turnover. Considering precedents where additions for bogus purchases approximate 5% GP, the CIT(A)'s imposition of 2.46% addition was reasonable and proportionate. Consequently, the ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s findings and dismissed the Revenue's appeal, confirming the limited addition to the assessee's income under the impugned assessment years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
