Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT set aside the reopening of assessment under section 147 against a dissolved firm, holding that the notice under section 148 was not served on the partners immediately before dissolution as required by section 283(2). Consequently, the assessment framed on such notice was invalid. Regarding additions under section 68, the Tribunal found that the assessee firm's trades were duly executed through stock exchanges, recorded in audited books, and no unexplained cash credits were established. The alleged amounts were not credited but rather represented business losses resulting in debit entries, negating the applicability of section 68 additions. The AO failed to demonstrate any unexplained cash credit. Following precedent, the Tribunal disallowed the additions under section 68 for both relevant assessment years and allowed the assessee's appeal.
The ITAT set aside the reopening of assessment under section 147 against a dissolved firm, holding that the notice under section 148 was not served on the partners immediately before dissolution as required by section 283(2). Consequently, the assessment framed on such notice was invalid. Regarding additions under section 68, the Tribunal found that the assessee firm's trades were duly executed through stock exchanges, recorded in audited books, and no unexplained cash credits were established. The alleged amounts were not credited but rather represented business losses resulting in debit entries, negating the applicability of section 68 additions. The AO failed to demonstrate any unexplained cash credit. Following precedent, the Tribunal disallowed the additions under section 68 for both relevant assessment years and allowed the assessee's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.