Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT set aside the reopening of assessment under section 147 against a dissolved firm, holding that the notice under section 148 was not served on the partners immediately before dissolution as required by section 283(2). Consequently, the assessment framed on such notice was invalid. Regarding additions under section 68, the Tribunal found that the assessee firm's trades were duly executed through stock exchanges, recorded in audited books, and no unexplained cash credits were established. The alleged amounts were not credited but rather represented business losses resulting in debit entries, negating the applicability of section 68 additions. The AO failed to demonstrate any unexplained cash credit. Following precedent, the Tribunal disallowed the additions under section 68 for both relevant assessment years and allowed the assessee's appeal.
The ITAT set aside the reopening of assessment under section 147 against a dissolved firm, holding that the notice under section 148 was not served on the partners immediately before dissolution as required by section 283(2). Consequently, the assessment framed on such notice was invalid. Regarding additions under section 68, the Tribunal found that the assessee firm's trades were duly executed through stock exchanges, recorded in audited books, and no unexplained cash credits were established. The alleged amounts were not credited but rather represented business losses resulting in debit entries, negating the applicability of section 68 additions. The AO failed to demonstrate any unexplained cash credit. Following precedent, the Tribunal disallowed the additions under section 68 for both relevant assessment years and allowed the assessee's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
