Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The CESTAT allowed the appeal by setting aside the order rejecting the conversion of free shipping bills into drawback shipping bills for exports between 25.07.2017 and 04.08.2017. The tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to claim All Industry Rate of Duty Drawback despite not filing drawback shipping bills at the time of export, as the non-filing was due to the transitional GST regime introduced on 01.07.2017 under Circular No. 22/2017-Cus. The tribunal emphasized that Circular No. 36/2010-Cus permits consideration of conversion requests on merits, particularly for All Industry Rate drawback claims. Consequently, the appellant's claim fell within the scope of this circular, and the rejection solely on procedural grounds was unjustified. The impugned order was therefore set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
The CESTAT allowed the appeal by setting aside the order rejecting the conversion of free shipping bills into drawback shipping bills for exports between 25.07.2017 and 04.08.2017. The tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to claim All Industry Rate of Duty Drawback despite not filing drawback shipping bills at the time of export, as the non-filing was due to the transitional GST regime introduced on 01.07.2017 under Circular No. 22/2017-Cus. The tribunal emphasized that Circular No. 36/2010-Cus permits consideration of conversion requests on merits, particularly for All Industry Rate drawback claims. Consequently, the appellant's claim fell within the scope of this circular, and the rejection solely on procedural grounds was unjustified. The impugned order was therefore set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.