Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT upheld the Adjudicating Authority's order permitting retention of Rs. 65 lakhs seized from the appellant pending trial under the PMLA. The appellant failed to produce bank statements or credible documentation to substantiate the lawful source of the cash, including alleged savings of the appellant's wife. The appellant's own statement under Section 50 of the PMLA corroborated involvement in illegal arms licensing, a predicate offence under the Arms Act and Prevention of Corruption Act applicable post the abrogation of Jammu and Kashmir's special status. The appellant's failure to justify the seized amount and admissions of illegal activity justified continued seizure. The appeal was dismissed as the impugned order was found legally sound and not liable to interference.
The AT upheld the Adjudicating Authority's order permitting retention of Rs. 65 lakhs seized from the appellant pending trial under the PMLA. The appellant failed to produce bank statements or credible documentation to substantiate the lawful source of the cash, including alleged savings of the appellant's wife. The appellant's own statement under Section 50 of the PMLA corroborated involvement in illegal arms licensing, a predicate offence under the Arms Act and Prevention of Corruption Act applicable post the abrogation of Jammu and Kashmir's special status. The appellant's failure to justify the seized amount and admissions of illegal activity justified continued seizure. The appeal was dismissed as the impugned order was found legally sound and not liable to interference.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
