Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The CESTAT allowed the appellant's appeal, setting aside the denial of refund of unutilized Cenvat credit relating to Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess discontinued post-2015. The Tribunal held that such credits, subsumed into Central Excise duty and eligible for transition to GST via the Trans-I Register, cannot be denied refund on the basis of limitation under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. It was clarified that Section 142(3) of the CGST Act mandates cash refunds notwithstanding Section 11B, except sub-section 11B(2). Therefore, the limitation period under Section 11B(1) does not apply to refund claims under the CGST Act. The Department's reliance on pre-GST limitation provisions was rejected, affirming the appellant's entitlement to cash refund under the GST framework.
The CESTAT allowed the appellant's appeal, setting aside the denial of refund of unutilized Cenvat credit relating to Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess discontinued post-2015. The Tribunal held that such credits, subsumed into Central Excise duty and eligible for transition to GST via the Trans-I Register, cannot be denied refund on the basis of limitation under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. It was clarified that Section 142(3) of the CGST Act mandates cash refunds notwithstanding Section 11B, except sub-section 11B(2). Therefore, the limitation period under Section 11B(1) does not apply to refund claims under the CGST Act. The Department's reliance on pre-GST limitation provisions was rejected, affirming the appellant's entitlement to cash refund under the GST framework.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.