Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the non-resident assessee, holding that salary income received in India for services rendered in China is not taxable in India under Sections 5(2), 9(1)(ii), and 15(1)(a) of the Act. The assessee, qualifying as a resident of China and non-resident of India for the relevant fiscal year, was eligible for exemption under Article 15(1) of the India-China DTAA. Since the salary was duly taxed in China and related to employment exercised there, the Tribunal set aside the AO's order denying exemption. The AO was directed to grant exemption under the DTAA, and the refund claimed by the assessee was upheld.
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the non-resident assessee, holding that salary income received in India for services rendered in China is not taxable in India under Sections 5(2), 9(1)(ii), and 15(1)(a) of the Act. The assessee, qualifying as a resident of China and non-resident of India for the relevant fiscal year, was eligible for exemption under Article 15(1) of the India-China DTAA. Since the salary was duly taxed in China and related to employment exercised there, the Tribunal set aside the AO's order denying exemption. The AO was directed to grant exemption under the DTAA, and the refund claimed by the assessee was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
