Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the non-resident assessee, holding that salary income received in India for services rendered in China is not taxable in India under Sections 5(2), 9(1)(ii), and 15(1)(a) of the Act. The assessee, qualifying as a resident of China and non-resident of India for the relevant fiscal year, was eligible for exemption under Article 15(1) of the India-China DTAA. Since the salary was duly taxed in China and related to employment exercised there, the Tribunal set aside the AO's order denying exemption. The AO was directed to grant exemption under the DTAA, and the refund claimed by the assessee was upheld.
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the non-resident assessee, holding that salary income received in India for services rendered in China is not taxable in India under Sections 5(2), 9(1)(ii), and 15(1)(a) of the Act. The assessee, qualifying as a resident of China and non-resident of India for the relevant fiscal year, was eligible for exemption under Article 15(1) of the India-China DTAA. Since the salary was duly taxed in China and related to employment exercised there, the Tribunal set aside the AO's order denying exemption. The AO was directed to grant exemption under the DTAA, and the refund claimed by the assessee was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
