Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
The ITAT directed the AO/TPO to base transfer pricing adjustments for electricity supplied from eligible to non-eligible units on the industry-standard transmission loss as determined by the Regulatory Authority, rather than the actual loss claimed by the assessee, which lacked supporting evidence. The transmission loss of 17.49% asserted by the assessee was rejected in the absence of proof, and the ALP was to be recalculated accordingly. Regarding steam transfer pricing, the Tribunal found the TPO's conversion method flawed and upheld the assessee's calculation, ordering the AO/TPO to recompute the cost of steam considering the assessee's submissions. Consequently, the ITAT partly allowed the appeal, mandating recalculation of transfer pricing adjustments for electricity and steam in line with prescribed regulatory norms and corrected methodologies.
The ITAT directed the AO/TPO to base transfer pricing adjustments for electricity supplied from eligible to non-eligible units on the industry-standard transmission loss as determined by the Regulatory Authority, rather than the actual loss claimed by the assessee, which lacked supporting evidence. The transmission loss of 17.49% asserted by the assessee was rejected in the absence of proof, and the ALP was to be recalculated accordingly. Regarding steam transfer pricing, the Tribunal found the TPO's conversion method flawed and upheld the assessee's calculation, ordering the AO/TPO to recompute the cost of steam considering the assessee's submissions. Consequently, the ITAT partly allowed the appeal, mandating recalculation of transfer pricing adjustments for electricity and steam in line with prescribed regulatory norms and corrected methodologies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.