Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The ITAT partially allowed the appeal by remanding the transfer pricing issue to the AO/TPO for fresh selection of comparables after applying the RPT filter with a 25% threshold, excluding functionally dissimilar entities such as M/s Angel Financial Advisors Pvt. Ltd. The AO/TPO was directed to rework the comparable analysis including companies suggested by the assessee and to apply correct margins as per the DRP's direction. Grounds 2 to 2.11 were partly allowed for statistical purposes. Regarding interest under sections 234B and 234C, the AO/TPO was directed to compute interest on the final income determined, disregarding additional income declared in the modified return filed under the APA framework. The decision aligns with prevailing judicial precedents and emphasizes adherence to correct comparability criteria and margin computations in transfer pricing assessments.
The ITAT partially allowed the appeal by remanding the transfer pricing issue to the AO/TPO for fresh selection of comparables after applying the RPT filter with a 25% threshold, excluding functionally dissimilar entities such as M/s Angel Financial Advisors Pvt. Ltd. The AO/TPO was directed to rework the comparable analysis including companies suggested by the assessee and to apply correct margins as per the DRP's direction. Grounds 2 to 2.11 were partly allowed for statistical purposes. Regarding interest under sections 234B and 234C, the AO/TPO was directed to compute interest on the final income determined, disregarding additional income declared in the modified return filed under the APA framework. The decision aligns with prevailing judicial precedents and emphasizes adherence to correct comparability criteria and margin computations in transfer pricing assessments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
