Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
The ITAT partially allowed the appeal by remanding the transfer pricing issue to the AO/TPO for fresh selection of comparables after applying the RPT filter with a 25% threshold, excluding functionally dissimilar entities such as M/s Angel Financial Advisors Pvt. Ltd. The AO/TPO was directed to rework the comparable analysis including companies suggested by the assessee and to apply correct margins as per the DRP's direction. Grounds 2 to 2.11 were partly allowed for statistical purposes. Regarding interest under sections 234B and 234C, the AO/TPO was directed to compute interest on the final income determined, disregarding additional income declared in the modified return filed under the APA framework. The decision aligns with prevailing judicial precedents and emphasizes adherence to correct comparability criteria and margin computations in transfer pricing assessments.
The ITAT partially allowed the appeal by remanding the transfer pricing issue to the AO/TPO for fresh selection of comparables after applying the RPT filter with a 25% threshold, excluding functionally dissimilar entities such as M/s Angel Financial Advisors Pvt. Ltd. The AO/TPO was directed to rework the comparable analysis including companies suggested by the assessee and to apply correct margins as per the DRP's direction. Grounds 2 to 2.11 were partly allowed for statistical purposes. Regarding interest under sections 234B and 234C, the AO/TPO was directed to compute interest on the final income determined, disregarding additional income declared in the modified return filed under the APA framework. The decision aligns with prevailing judicial precedents and emphasizes adherence to correct comparability criteria and margin computations in transfer pricing assessments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
