Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The ITAT partially allowed the appeal by remanding the transfer pricing issue to the AO/TPO for fresh selection of comparables after applying the RPT filter with a 25% threshold, excluding functionally dissimilar entities such as M/s Angel Financial Advisors Pvt. Ltd. The AO/TPO was directed to rework the comparable analysis including companies suggested by the assessee and to apply correct margins as per the DRP's direction. Grounds 2 to 2.11 were partly allowed for statistical purposes. Regarding interest under sections 234B and 234C, the AO/TPO was directed to compute interest on the final income determined, disregarding additional income declared in the modified return filed under the APA framework. The decision aligns with prevailing judicial precedents and emphasizes adherence to correct comparability criteria and margin computations in transfer pricing assessments.
The ITAT partially allowed the appeal by remanding the transfer pricing issue to the AO/TPO for fresh selection of comparables after applying the RPT filter with a 25% threshold, excluding functionally dissimilar entities such as M/s Angel Financial Advisors Pvt. Ltd. The AO/TPO was directed to rework the comparable analysis including companies suggested by the assessee and to apply correct margins as per the DRP's direction. Grounds 2 to 2.11 were partly allowed for statistical purposes. Regarding interest under sections 234B and 234C, the AO/TPO was directed to compute interest on the final income determined, disregarding additional income declared in the modified return filed under the APA framework. The decision aligns with prevailing judicial precedents and emphasizes adherence to correct comparability criteria and margin computations in transfer pricing assessments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
