Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
The HC held that the cancellation of the petitioner's registration was invalid due to violation of natural justice, specifically the failure to grant an opportunity of hearing and non-application of mind. Despite the petitioner submitting a reply, the order incorrectly stated no reply was received, indicating a lack of proper consideration. The court found the impugned order arbitrary and not meeting the standards of Article 14 of the Constitution. Consequently, the HC quashed the cancellation order and allowed the petition.
The HC held that the cancellation of the petitioner's registration was invalid due to violation of natural justice, specifically the failure to grant an opportunity of hearing and non-application of mind. Despite the petitioner submitting a reply, the order incorrectly stated no reply was received, indicating a lack of proper consideration. The court found the impugned order arbitrary and not meeting the standards of Article 14 of the Constitution. Consequently, the HC quashed the cancellation order and allowed the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.