Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The ITAT held that guarantee fees received by a South Korean resident company from its Indian subsidiary do not constitute business profits or interest under the India-Korea DTAA. The fees do not fall under Articles 6, 7, or 11 but are governed by the residual Article 22 "Other Income." Since the income arises from a source not specifically covered by other treaty provisions, it is taxable only in the resident state, South Korea. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled that the guarantee fees are not taxable in India under the Income-tax Act. The addition made by the Assessing Officer was deleted, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
The ITAT held that guarantee fees received by a South Korean resident company from its Indian subsidiary do not constitute business profits or interest under the India-Korea DTAA. The fees do not fall under Articles 6, 7, or 11 but are governed by the residual Article 22 "Other Income." Since the income arises from a source not specifically covered by other treaty provisions, it is taxable only in the resident state, South Korea. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled that the guarantee fees are not taxable in India under the Income-tax Act. The addition made by the Assessing Officer was deleted, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
