Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The CESTAT upheld the imposition of penalties on the appellants for conspiring to import prohibited poppy seeds concealed within limestone powder. The appellants fraudulently used another individual's identity to establish a firm and engaged a third party to facilitate customs clearance, demonstrating deliberate deception to evade legal consequences. The Tribunal found no merit in the appellants' claims and concluded that the lower authority had already exercised leniency despite the serious nature of the offenses. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the penalties and the absolute confiscation of the illicit consignment.
The CESTAT upheld the imposition of penalties on the appellants for conspiring to import prohibited poppy seeds concealed within limestone powder. The appellants fraudulently used another individual's identity to establish a firm and engaged a third party to facilitate customs clearance, demonstrating deliberate deception to evade legal consequences. The Tribunal found no merit in the appellants' claims and concluded that the lower authority had already exercised leniency despite the serious nature of the offenses. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the penalties and the absolute confiscation of the illicit consignment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.