TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
The HC held that the Adjudicating Authority failed to comply with Regulation 27 of the Adjudicating Authority (Procedure) Regulations, 2013, by not duly serving the order dated 7.10.2024 on the petitioner or his counsel, despite the petitioner's counsel having filed a Vakalatnama and the petitioner being in judicial custody. The court directed the Adjudicating Authority to furnish a copy of the order to the petitioner or his counsel within seven days of receiving the present order and granted the petitioner 20 days thereafter to file an appeal. The HC emphasized that the appeal tribunal is not bound by its observations and shall adjudicate the appeal on its merits. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The HC held that the Adjudicating Authority failed to comply with Regulation 27 of the Adjudicating Authority (Procedure) Regulations, 2013, by not duly serving the order dated 7.10.2024 on the petitioner or his counsel, despite the petitioner's counsel having filed a Vakalatnama and the petitioner being in judicial custody. The court directed the Adjudicating Authority to furnish a copy of the order to the petitioner or his counsel within seven days of receiving the present order and granted the petitioner 20 days thereafter to file an appeal. The HC emphasized that the appeal tribunal is not bound by its observations and shall adjudicate the appeal on its merits. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
