Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The CESTAT upheld the imposition of service tax on the appellants for providing Business Support Services to the respondent, rejecting their characterization of the transactions as transfer of developmental rights in immovable property, which fall outside service tax ambit. The tribunal found that the appellants intentionally concealed the true nature of the transactions to evade tax, justifying invocation of the extended limitation period. The arrangement was correctly treated as taxable business support services rather than a sale of transferable development rights. Consequently, the demand for service tax was confirmed, and the appeal was dismissed for lack of merit.
The CESTAT upheld the imposition of service tax on the appellants for providing Business Support Services to the respondent, rejecting their characterization of the transactions as transfer of developmental rights in immovable property, which fall outside service tax ambit. The tribunal found that the appellants intentionally concealed the true nature of the transactions to evade tax, justifying invocation of the extended limitation period. The arrangement was correctly treated as taxable business support services rather than a sale of transferable development rights. Consequently, the demand for service tax was confirmed, and the appeal was dismissed for lack of merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.