Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that the reassessment proceedings were invalid due to non-service of proper notice under Section 148, as the initial notice was sent to an incorrect email ID. The petitioner only became aware of the proceedings upon receipt of a notice sent to the correct email on 18.10.2022, a fact not disputed by the DR. The court emphasized the principle of audi alteram partem, requiring fair hearing through proper notice to ensure an unbiased process. Since the petitioner was deprived of the opportunity to contest the reassessment due to defective service of notice, the appeal was allowed, rendering the reassessment proceedings void ab initio.
The HC held that the reassessment proceedings were invalid due to non-service of proper notice under Section 148, as the initial notice was sent to an incorrect email ID. The petitioner only became aware of the proceedings upon receipt of a notice sent to the correct email on 18.10.2022, a fact not disputed by the DR. The court emphasized the principle of audi alteram partem, requiring fair hearing through proper notice to ensure an unbiased process. Since the petitioner was deprived of the opportunity to contest the reassessment due to defective service of notice, the appeal was allowed, rendering the reassessment proceedings void ab initio.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
