Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC set aside the AO's order rejecting the petitioner's application for a nil withholding tax certificate under section 195(2) and remanded the matter to the CIT for fresh consideration. The court held that the AO must assess the fair market value (FMV) of the shares as of 31.03.2025 to determine potential capital gains under section 50CA. The historical acquisition cost was deemed irrelevant for the current transaction. The petitioner was directed to submit a fresh valuation report by an approved valuer within four weeks. The CIT is to evaluate the application based on this updated FMV, ensuring compliance with Rule 11UA. The decision clarifies that withholding tax determination depends on the current FMV at the time of sale, not prior acquisition values.
The HC set aside the AO's order rejecting the petitioner's application for a nil withholding tax certificate under section 195(2) and remanded the matter to the CIT for fresh consideration. The court held that the AO must assess the fair market value (FMV) of the shares as of 31.03.2025 to determine potential capital gains under section 50CA. The historical acquisition cost was deemed irrelevant for the current transaction. The petitioner was directed to submit a fresh valuation report by an approved valuer within four weeks. The CIT is to evaluate the application based on this updated FMV, ensuring compliance with Rule 11UA. The decision clarifies that withholding tax determination depends on the current FMV at the time of sale, not prior acquisition values.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.