Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that Section 41(1) was inapplicable as the liability claimed by the creditor remained unresolved and pending adjudication. Since the suits were sub judice, no remission or cessation of liability had occurred. The assessee had merely made provisions for the liability in the books for AY 2001-02, which did not constitute extinguishment of debt under Section 41(1). The Court relied on established principles that the expiry of the limitation period does not extinguish the debt but only bars enforcement, and unilateral accounting entries by the debtor cannot extinguish liability. Consequently, the assessee was not required to include the amount as income under Section 41(1), affirming the decisions of lower authorities and ruling in favor of the assessee.
The HC held that Section 41(1) was inapplicable as the liability claimed by the creditor remained unresolved and pending adjudication. Since the suits were sub judice, no remission or cessation of liability had occurred. The assessee had merely made provisions for the liability in the books for AY 2001-02, which did not constitute extinguishment of debt under Section 41(1). The Court relied on established principles that the expiry of the limitation period does not extinguish the debt but only bars enforcement, and unilateral accounting entries by the debtor cannot extinguish liability. Consequently, the assessee was not required to include the amount as income under Section 41(1), affirming the decisions of lower authorities and ruling in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.