Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that the assessment order under Section 144 read with Section 147 was invalid due to non-service of notice on the petitioners, who are the legal heirs of the deceased assessee. The respondent failed to produce evidence of proper service of notice, as only dispatch receipts from the Postal Department were available, lacking acknowledgment of receipt. The Court emphasized the necessity for the Income Tax Department to maintain integrated and reliable records of notice service akin to the Court's system. Since no proof of notice service on the petitioners was furnished and they were not brought on record as legal heirs, the orders passed against them without proper notice were quashed. The writ petition was allowed accordingly.
The HC held that the assessment order under Section 144 read with Section 147 was invalid due to non-service of notice on the petitioners, who are the legal heirs of the deceased assessee. The respondent failed to produce evidence of proper service of notice, as only dispatch receipts from the Postal Department were available, lacking acknowledgment of receipt. The Court emphasized the necessity for the Income Tax Department to maintain integrated and reliable records of notice service akin to the Court's system. Since no proof of notice service on the petitioners was furnished and they were not brought on record as legal heirs, the orders passed against them without proper notice were quashed. The writ petition was allowed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.