Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The ITAT upheld the principle of consistency, affirming that the assessee's income declared under presumptive taxation u/s 44AD must be accepted as in prior years. The assessee, engaged in wholesale livestock trading and mutton sales, provided valid certification and evidence confirming the business's legitimacy. Previous assessments under section 153A r.w.s. 143(3) consistently accepted the returns filed on a presumptive basis without material change in facts. The Tribunal held that proof of an eligible business existed, and absence of detailed invoices was excused due to the nature of the livestock trade in J&K. The seized cash of Rs. 7 lakhs was satisfactorily explained as part of the assessee's normal business cash flow. Consequently, the addition u/s 69A was disallowed, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.
The ITAT upheld the principle of consistency, affirming that the assessee's income declared under presumptive taxation u/s 44AD must be accepted as in prior years. The assessee, engaged in wholesale livestock trading and mutton sales, provided valid certification and evidence confirming the business's legitimacy. Previous assessments under section 153A r.w.s. 143(3) consistently accepted the returns filed on a presumptive basis without material change in facts. The Tribunal held that proof of an eligible business existed, and absence of detailed invoices was excused due to the nature of the livestock trade in J&K. The seized cash of Rs. 7 lakhs was satisfactorily explained as part of the assessee's normal business cash flow. Consequently, the addition u/s 69A was disallowed, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.