Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC reversed the tribunal's refusal to condone a 204-day delay in filing appeals under Section 46 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988. The court emphasized that the appellate tribunal possesses absolute discretion to condone delays beyond 45 days without any prescribed outer limit, provided sufficient cause is shown. The tribunal's rigid approach was deemed unjust, particularly as the appellant was denied the opportunity to contest proceedings under Section 26 of the Act. The HC held that the merits of the appeal do not preclude condonation of delay, and each case must be assessed on its facts to determine sufficient cause. Consequently, the tribunal's dismissal of the appeals was set aside, and the 204-day delay was condoned, allowing the appeals to proceed for adjudication.
The HC reversed the tribunal's refusal to condone a 204-day delay in filing appeals under Section 46 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988. The court emphasized that the appellate tribunal possesses absolute discretion to condone delays beyond 45 days without any prescribed outer limit, provided sufficient cause is shown. The tribunal's rigid approach was deemed unjust, particularly as the appellant was denied the opportunity to contest proceedings under Section 26 of the Act. The HC held that the merits of the appeal do not preclude condonation of delay, and each case must be assessed on its facts to determine sufficient cause. Consequently, the tribunal's dismissal of the appeals was set aside, and the 204-day delay was condoned, allowing the appeals to proceed for adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.