Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority's order directing payment of fees and expenses to the IRP, rejecting the appellant's contention regarding non-ratification by the CoC. The Tribunal clarified that ratification, as per Section 196 of the Indian Contract Act, is a procedural affirmation of a prior decision and can be express or implied. The 2nd CoC meeting ratified the minutes of the 1st CoC meeting, thereby validating the IRP's fee and expenses incurred during his tenure. Consequently, the issue of non-ratification does not preclude payment to the IRP under Regulation 33(3) of the IBBI Regulations. The appellate challenge was found devoid of merit, and the appeal was dismissed, affirming the IRP's entitlement to the remitted amount without interference.
The NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority's order directing payment of fees and expenses to the IRP, rejecting the appellant's contention regarding non-ratification by the CoC. The Tribunal clarified that ratification, as per Section 196 of the Indian Contract Act, is a procedural affirmation of a prior decision and can be express or implied. The 2nd CoC meeting ratified the minutes of the 1st CoC meeting, thereby validating the IRP's fee and expenses incurred during his tenure. Consequently, the issue of non-ratification does not preclude payment to the IRP under Regulation 33(3) of the IBBI Regulations. The appellate challenge was found devoid of merit, and the appeal was dismissed, affirming the IRP's entitlement to the remitted amount without interference.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
