Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The appellant was entitled to interest on the refunded amounts following the final adjudication in their favor; however, the interest entitlement is governed strictly by statutory provisions under Sections 35FF and 11BB of the Central Excise Act. The tribunal held that interest accrues only after three months from the receipt of the refund claim application, not from the date of deposit or refund, as the statute prescribes. The appellant's claim for interest from the date of deposit was rejected, aligning with the proviso to Section 35FF applicable to deposits made before the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014. Reliance on judicial principles allowing interest in the absence of statutory provisions was deemed inapposite, given the explicit statutory framework governing interest in this case. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming that interest must be paid in accordance with the prescribed statutory timeline and rates.
The appellant was entitled to interest on the refunded amounts following the final adjudication in their favor; however, the interest entitlement is governed strictly by statutory provisions under Sections 35FF and 11BB of the Central Excise Act. The tribunal held that interest accrues only after three months from the receipt of the refund claim application, not from the date of deposit or refund, as the statute prescribes. The appellant's claim for interest from the date of deposit was rejected, aligning with the proviso to Section 35FF applicable to deposits made before the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014. Reliance on judicial principles allowing interest in the absence of statutory provisions was deemed inapposite, given the explicit statutory framework governing interest in this case. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming that interest must be paid in accordance with the prescribed statutory timeline and rates.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.