Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
481 to 500 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the petition challenging the impugned order demanding tax, interest, and penalty, holding that the Assessing Authority had duly considered the appellant's reply and provided an opportunity of hearing prior to issuance. The court found no violation of natural justice principles, rejecting the appellant's contention that the order was passed without due process. The appellant was found to have an alternative efficacious remedy and was granted liberty to file an appeal before the designated appellate authority within 30 days of receipt of the order. The appellate authority was directed to adjudicate the appeal in accordance with law within a reasonable timeframe, without raising limitation objections. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed for lack of merit.
The HC dismissed the petition challenging the impugned order demanding tax, interest, and penalty, holding that the Assessing Authority had duly considered the appellant's reply and provided an opportunity of hearing prior to issuance. The court found no violation of natural justice principles, rejecting the appellant's contention that the order was passed without due process. The appellant was found to have an alternative efficacious remedy and was granted liberty to file an appeal before the designated appellate authority within 30 days of receipt of the order. The appellate authority was directed to adjudicate the appeal in accordance with law within a reasonable timeframe, without raising limitation objections. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed for lack of merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
