Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The SC affirmed the NCLAT's decision, dismissing the appeal concerning alleged fraudulent transactions under Section 66 of the IBC, 2016. The appellant contended that the impugned transactions were normal commercial dealings aimed at alleviating financial distress. However, the tribunal found no evidence of malafide intention or wilful misconduct by the corporate debtor. The SC held that the transactions did not warrant interference, upholding the lower authority's conclusion that the appellant's contention lacked merit. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, confirming the validity of the impugned orders.
The SC affirmed the NCLAT's decision, dismissing the appeal concerning alleged fraudulent transactions under Section 66 of the IBC, 2016. The appellant contended that the impugned transactions were normal commercial dealings aimed at alleviating financial distress. However, the tribunal found no evidence of malafide intention or wilful misconduct by the corporate debtor. The SC held that the transactions did not warrant interference, upholding the lower authority's conclusion that the appellant's contention lacked merit. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, confirming the validity of the impugned orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
