Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
The SC affirmed the NCLAT's decision, dismissing the appeal concerning alleged fraudulent transactions under Section 66 of the IBC, 2016. The appellant contended that the impugned transactions were normal commercial dealings aimed at alleviating financial distress. However, the tribunal found no evidence of malafide intention or wilful misconduct by the corporate debtor. The SC held that the transactions did not warrant interference, upholding the lower authority's conclusion that the appellant's contention lacked merit. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, confirming the validity of the impugned orders.
The SC affirmed the NCLAT's decision, dismissing the appeal concerning alleged fraudulent transactions under Section 66 of the IBC, 2016. The appellant contended that the impugned transactions were normal commercial dealings aimed at alleviating financial distress. However, the tribunal found no evidence of malafide intention or wilful misconduct by the corporate debtor. The SC held that the transactions did not warrant interference, upholding the lower authority's conclusion that the appellant's contention lacked merit. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, confirming the validity of the impugned orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
