Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The SC affirmed the NCLAT's decision, dismissing the appeal concerning alleged fraudulent transactions under Section 66 of the IBC, 2016. The appellant contended that the impugned transactions were normal commercial dealings aimed at alleviating financial distress. However, the tribunal found no evidence of malafide intention or wilful misconduct by the corporate debtor. The SC held that the transactions did not warrant interference, upholding the lower authority's conclusion that the appellant's contention lacked merit. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, confirming the validity of the impugned orders.
The SC affirmed the NCLAT's decision, dismissing the appeal concerning alleged fraudulent transactions under Section 66 of the IBC, 2016. The appellant contended that the impugned transactions were normal commercial dealings aimed at alleviating financial distress. However, the tribunal found no evidence of malafide intention or wilful misconduct by the corporate debtor. The SC held that the transactions did not warrant interference, upholding the lower authority's conclusion that the appellant's contention lacked merit. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, confirming the validity of the impugned orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
