Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3321 to 3340 of 96332 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The SC dismissed the appellant's company petition on grounds of maintainability and delay under Section 244(b) of the Companies Act, 2013. The court upheld the NCLAT's finding that the appellant's claim of continued membership was untenable and lacked credibility. The SC found no merit to disturb the impugned order of the NCLAT, affirming that the petition was not maintainable due to the appellant's inaction and delay. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
The SC dismissed the appellant's company petition on grounds of maintainability and delay under Section 244(b) of the Companies Act, 2013. The court upheld the NCLAT's finding that the appellant's claim of continued membership was untenable and lacked credibility. The SC found no merit to disturb the impugned order of the NCLAT, affirming that the petition was not maintainable due to the appellant's inaction and delay. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.