Omitted specified domestic transaction provision invalidates related-party expenditure transfer-pricing references and assessments based on consequent...
Preventive suspension requires an immediate continuing threat and cannot become indefinite without inquiry, fresh evidence, or proportionate safeguard...
The HC quashed the ex-parte assessment order passed under Section 147, rejecting the petitioner's claim that business cessation prevented activation of the PAN and opportunity to reply under Section 148A(b). Exercising discretion in the interest of justice, the court remanded the matter to the first respondent for fresh adjudication, permitting the petitioner to respond to the Section 148A(b) notice. This ensures procedural fairness by allowing the petitioner to furnish documents and be heard before further proceedings.
The HC quashed the ex-parte assessment order passed under Section 147, rejecting the petitioner's claim that business cessation prevented activation of the PAN and opportunity to reply under Section 148A(b). Exercising discretion in the interest of justice, the court remanded the matter to the first respondent for fresh adjudication, permitting the petitioner to respond to the Section 148A(b) notice. This ensures procedural fairness by allowing the petitioner to furnish documents and be heard before further proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
