Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1161 to 1180 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT upheld the validity of the reassessment order under section 147 read with section 143(3), finding sufficient new material and reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment for AY 2012-13 based on investigation reports and non-compliance by the assessee. The tribunal rejected the assessee's contention of change of opinion and improper assumption of jurisdiction. However, additions made under section 68 regarding the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share application money were set aside for fresh inquiry, as the AO had not fully verified the parties involved. The AO was directed to conduct further enquiries and provide the assessee with reasonable opportunity of being heard. Additionally, the matter concerning alleged accommodation entries based on the Inspector's report was remanded for reconsideration, with instructions to furnish the report to the assessee and allow them to respond. Grounds relating to these issues were allowed for statistical purposes, while others were dismissed.
The ITAT upheld the validity of the reassessment order under section 147 read with section 143(3), finding sufficient new material and reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment for AY 2012-13 based on investigation reports and non-compliance by the assessee. The tribunal rejected the assessee's contention of change of opinion and improper assumption of jurisdiction. However, additions made under section 68 regarding the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share application money were set aside for fresh inquiry, as the AO had not fully verified the parties involved. The AO was directed to conduct further enquiries and provide the assessee with reasonable opportunity of being heard. Additionally, the matter concerning alleged accommodation entries based on the Inspector's report was remanded for reconsideration, with instructions to furnish the report to the assessee and allow them to respond. Grounds relating to these issues were allowed for statistical purposes, while others were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
