Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
The HC allowed the writ petition and intra-Court appeal, setting aside the appellate authority's order dated 4th October 2024. The matter was remanded to the Assistant Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise, Dinajpur Division, for fresh adjudication. The court emphasized the necessity to afford the assessee an opportunity to reconcile the alleged wrongful availing of ITC, highlighting that if the ITC has already been reversed, the issue becomes revenue neutral, negating the requirement for any pre-deposit. The absence of interest levy by the adjudicating authority further indicated reversal of ITC. The HC underscored that these factual disputes must be resolved by the original authority, ensuring adherence to principles of natural justice.
The HC allowed the writ petition and intra-Court appeal, setting aside the appellate authority's order dated 4th October 2024. The matter was remanded to the Assistant Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise, Dinajpur Division, for fresh adjudication. The court emphasized the necessity to afford the assessee an opportunity to reconcile the alleged wrongful availing of ITC, highlighting that if the ITC has already been reversed, the issue becomes revenue neutral, negating the requirement for any pre-deposit. The absence of interest levy by the adjudicating authority further indicated reversal of ITC. The HC underscored that these factual disputes must be resolved by the original authority, ensuring adherence to principles of natural justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
