Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT upheld the additions made against the assessee for double inclusion of property purchase income and unexplained cash deposits linked to the IDS Scheme, noting the assessee's repeated failure to respond to multiple opportunities to present their case before the AO and CIT(A). The tribunal found no procedural lapses by the authorities, attributing the adverse outcome solely to the assessee's non-compliance and default. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the AO for fresh examination, directing the assessee to deposit Rs. 2,000 as costs to the Prime Minister's National Relief Fund within 90 days. The decision underscores the importance of procedural compliance and the consequences of non-cooperation in tax assessments.
The ITAT upheld the additions made against the assessee for double inclusion of property purchase income and unexplained cash deposits linked to the IDS Scheme, noting the assessee's repeated failure to respond to multiple opportunities to present their case before the AO and CIT(A). The tribunal found no procedural lapses by the authorities, attributing the adverse outcome solely to the assessee's non-compliance and default. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the AO for fresh examination, directing the assessee to deposit Rs. 2,000 as costs to the Prime Minister's National Relief Fund within 90 days. The decision underscores the importance of procedural compliance and the consequences of non-cooperation in tax assessments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.