Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that the initial unsigned assessment order issued in the name of the non-existent company was invalid, affirming the validity of the successor company's signed order. The tribunal ruled that the provisions of section 56(2)(viia) do not apply to buyback of a company's own shares, as such shares do not "become property" of the recipient nor are they "shares of any other company," thus negating the addition made on this ground. Regarding interest income on income-tax refunds and long-term non-trade investments, the tribunal found that the AO erred in treating it as business income, breaching the principle of consistency since the income was previously declared under "income from other sources." Lastly, the claim for deduction under section 35AC was restored for fresh adjudication with directions to the AO to examine evidence and provide a fair hearing to the assessee.
The ITAT held that the initial unsigned assessment order issued in the name of the non-existent company was invalid, affirming the validity of the successor company's signed order. The tribunal ruled that the provisions of section 56(2)(viia) do not apply to buyback of a company's own shares, as such shares do not "become property" of the recipient nor are they "shares of any other company," thus negating the addition made on this ground. Regarding interest income on income-tax refunds and long-term non-trade investments, the tribunal found that the AO erred in treating it as business income, breaching the principle of consistency since the income was previously declared under "income from other sources." Lastly, the claim for deduction under section 35AC was restored for fresh adjudication with directions to the AO to examine evidence and provide a fair hearing to the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.