Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The SC upheld the NCLAT's decision affirming the priority of the UCO Bank Consortium's first charge over the movable assets of the Corporate Debtor, despite the Respondent's registration of a charge under Section 77 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Court rejected the Respondent's contention that registration with the ROC conferred priority, holding that non-registration by UCO Bank Consortium did not invalidate its first charge established by the 8th Supplemental Deed of Working Capital Consortium Agreement. The appeal challenging the NCLAT's order was dismissed, confirming the primacy of the Consortium's charge and maintaining the priority framework as determined below.
The SC upheld the NCLAT's decision affirming the priority of the UCO Bank Consortium's first charge over the movable assets of the Corporate Debtor, despite the Respondent's registration of a charge under Section 77 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Court rejected the Respondent's contention that registration with the ROC conferred priority, holding that non-registration by UCO Bank Consortium did not invalidate its first charge established by the 8th Supplemental Deed of Working Capital Consortium Agreement. The appeal challenging the NCLAT's order was dismissed, confirming the primacy of the Consortium's charge and maintaining the priority framework as determined below.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.