Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The SC affirmed that the NCLT possesses jurisdiction under Section 60(5) of the IBC to adjudicate disputes arising from insolvency resolution processes, including claims relating to pre-CIRP dues. It upheld the primacy of the IBC over conflicting statutes by virtue of Section 238, specifically overriding provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003. The Court confirmed that an approved resolution plan is binding on all stakeholders, effectively extinguishing outstanding dues predating the CIRP unless properly claimed during the process. Consequently, the SC dismissed the appeal, finding no merit to disturb the NCLAT's decision that nullified the appellant's claims for pre-CIRP dues, thereby validating the resolution plan's finality and the insolvency framework's comprehensive jurisdiction.
The SC affirmed that the NCLT possesses jurisdiction under Section 60(5) of the IBC to adjudicate disputes arising from insolvency resolution processes, including claims relating to pre-CIRP dues. It upheld the primacy of the IBC over conflicting statutes by virtue of Section 238, specifically overriding provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003. The Court confirmed that an approved resolution plan is binding on all stakeholders, effectively extinguishing outstanding dues predating the CIRP unless properly claimed during the process. Consequently, the SC dismissed the appeal, finding no merit to disturb the NCLAT's decision that nullified the appellant's claims for pre-CIRP dues, thereby validating the resolution plan's finality and the insolvency framework's comprehensive jurisdiction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
