Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC granted interim bail to the applicant in a money laundering case, emphasizing that the mere presence of the applicant's father as a director in certain companies does not justify denial of bail, as it would infringe on the applicant's fundamental rights under Article 19(1)(g). The court found no credible suspicion regarding the genuineness of the bail request and noted the applicant's prior interim bail granted under the SARFAESI Act for related business matters. The applicant was ordered released on interim bail from July 10, 2025, to August 4, 2025, upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 200,000 with two sureties of the same amount, subject to conditions set by the trial court. The bail application was accordingly allowed.
The HC granted interim bail to the applicant in a money laundering case, emphasizing that the mere presence of the applicant's father as a director in certain companies does not justify denial of bail, as it would infringe on the applicant's fundamental rights under Article 19(1)(g). The court found no credible suspicion regarding the genuineness of the bail request and noted the applicant's prior interim bail granted under the SARFAESI Act for related business matters. The applicant was ordered released on interim bail from July 10, 2025, to August 4, 2025, upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 200,000 with two sureties of the same amount, subject to conditions set by the trial court. The bail application was accordingly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
