Transfer-pricing benchmarking and capital-receipt principles sustained taxpayer relief, while unsupported property-advance write-offs remained disallo...
Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1001 to 1020 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT reversed the CIT(A)'s confirmation of the AO's disallowance, directing allowance of deductions under sections 80P(2)(d) and 80P(2)(iv) of the Act. It held that deduction under section 80P(2)(d) for dividend and interest income from investments in cooperative societies is permissible on the gross amount, not net, distinguishing prior case law concerning business profits. The claim for deduction on profits from seed sales under section 80P(2)(iv) was upheld as per earlier ITAT decisions, allowing a 20% attribution of indirect expenses. Regarding section 14A read with Rule 8D disallowance for expenses incurred to earn exempt income, the tribunal ruled that such provisions do not apply to expenses related to income deductible under Chapter VIA. Consequently, the ITAT ruled entirely in favor of the assessee, directing the AO to grant the claimed deductions and delete the section 14A disallowance.
The ITAT reversed the CIT(A)'s confirmation of the AO's disallowance, directing allowance of deductions under sections 80P(2)(d) and 80P(2)(iv) of the Act. It held that deduction under section 80P(2)(d) for dividend and interest income from investments in cooperative societies is permissible on the gross amount, not net, distinguishing prior case law concerning business profits. The claim for deduction on profits from seed sales under section 80P(2)(iv) was upheld as per earlier ITAT decisions, allowing a 20% attribution of indirect expenses. Regarding section 14A read with Rule 8D disallowance for expenses incurred to earn exempt income, the tribunal ruled that such provisions do not apply to expenses related to income deductible under Chapter VIA. Consequently, the ITAT ruled entirely in favor of the assessee, directing the AO to grant the claimed deductions and delete the section 14A disallowance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
