Cooperative society deposits, member-interest TDS exemption and credit-facility deduction claims require verification through records and supporting e...
Customs jurisdiction over EPCG condition breaches survives export-obligation discharge certificates, requiring alleged fraud and misdeclaration to be ...
Contractual tolerance requires consideration; breach recoveries, qualifying public infrastructure services and road works escape service tax liability...
The HC approved a consent arrangement resolving the dispute concerning alleged fraudulent trading in RTS securities. The petitioner committed to furnishing a fresh pay order of Rs. 25,00,000 by a specified date towards settlement charges and confirmed non-engagement in securities trading since issuance of show cause notices, fulfilling a three-year debarment condition. Consequently, the petitioner was permitted immediate access to capital markets. The respondent agreed to formalize a consent order within two weeks of receiving the pay order, leading to settlement of proceedings initiated under the show cause notices. Prior SEBI orders restraining the petitioner were rendered unenforceable. The consent order explicitly stated it neither exonerated nor implicated the petitioner regarding violations under the SEBI Act or Regulations. Pending litigation involving the petitioner and third parties was preserved for adjudication on merits by the appropriate forum.
The HC approved a consent arrangement resolving the dispute concerning alleged fraudulent trading in RTS securities. The petitioner committed to furnishing a fresh pay order of Rs. 25,00,000 by a specified date towards settlement charges and confirmed non-engagement in securities trading since issuance of show cause notices, fulfilling a three-year debarment condition. Consequently, the petitioner was permitted immediate access to capital markets. The respondent agreed to formalize a consent order within two weeks of receiving the pay order, leading to settlement of proceedings initiated under the show cause notices. Prior SEBI orders restraining the petitioner were rendered unenforceable. The consent order explicitly stated it neither exonerated nor implicated the petitioner regarding violations under the SEBI Act or Regulations. Pending litigation involving the petitioner and third parties was preserved for adjudication on merits by the appropriate forum.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
