Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Board found that the promoters and promoter-related entities of the Company violated SEBI regulations and Section 67 of the Companies Act, 2013, by diverting company funds through connected entities for trading in the Company's shares, resulting in misleading disclosures to investors. The promoters submitted forged lender conduct letters and failed to disclose related party transactions as mandated under SEBI LODR Regulations. The Board observed weak internal controls and directed interim measures under SEBI Act to protect investor interests: promoters were restrained from holding directorial or KMP positions and from trading in securities; the announced stock split was stayed; and a forensic audit of the Company and its related parties was ordered. These directions remain in force pending further orders, with the promoters given an opportunity to file objections and seek a personal hearing.
The Board found that the promoters and promoter-related entities of the Company violated SEBI regulations and Section 67 of the Companies Act, 2013, by diverting company funds through connected entities for trading in the Company's shares, resulting in misleading disclosures to investors. The promoters submitted forged lender conduct letters and failed to disclose related party transactions as mandated under SEBI LODR Regulations. The Board observed weak internal controls and directed interim measures under SEBI Act to protect investor interests: promoters were restrained from holding directorial or KMP positions and from trading in securities; the announced stock split was stayed; and a forensic audit of the Company and its related parties was ordered. These directions remain in force pending further orders, with the promoters given an opportunity to file objections and seek a personal hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
