Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
481 to 500 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Board found that the promoters and promoter-related entities of the Company violated SEBI regulations and Section 67 of the Companies Act, 2013, by diverting company funds through connected entities for trading in the Company's shares, resulting in misleading disclosures to investors. The promoters submitted forged lender conduct letters and failed to disclose related party transactions as mandated under SEBI LODR Regulations. The Board observed weak internal controls and directed interim measures under SEBI Act to protect investor interests: promoters were restrained from holding directorial or KMP positions and from trading in securities; the announced stock split was stayed; and a forensic audit of the Company and its related parties was ordered. These directions remain in force pending further orders, with the promoters given an opportunity to file objections and seek a personal hearing.
The Board found that the promoters and promoter-related entities of the Company violated SEBI regulations and Section 67 of the Companies Act, 2013, by diverting company funds through connected entities for trading in the Company's shares, resulting in misleading disclosures to investors. The promoters submitted forged lender conduct letters and failed to disclose related party transactions as mandated under SEBI LODR Regulations. The Board observed weak internal controls and directed interim measures under SEBI Act to protect investor interests: promoters were restrained from holding directorial or KMP positions and from trading in securities; the announced stock split was stayed; and a forensic audit of the Company and its related parties was ordered. These directions remain in force pending further orders, with the promoters given an opportunity to file objections and seek a personal hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
