Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT upheld the DRP/TPO's characterization of foreign exchange losses as operating items, affirming that such gains or losses arise from normal business activities, particularly in export operations, and are not extraordinary in nature; thus, no transfer pricing adjustment was warranted. Conversely, the Tribunal found merit in the assessee's contention regarding product development expenses, distinguishing them from operating expenses due to their non-incurrence during the year and lack of linkage to revenue. The ITAT directed the TPO to reassess the product development expense adjustment consistent with prior years' rulings, subject to the assessee furnishing appropriate substantiation. The order of the lower authorities on foreign exchange losses was affirmed, while the product development expenses adjustment was remanded for reconsideration.
The ITAT upheld the DRP/TPO's characterization of foreign exchange losses as operating items, affirming that such gains or losses arise from normal business activities, particularly in export operations, and are not extraordinary in nature; thus, no transfer pricing adjustment was warranted. Conversely, the Tribunal found merit in the assessee's contention regarding product development expenses, distinguishing them from operating expenses due to their non-incurrence during the year and lack of linkage to revenue. The ITAT directed the TPO to reassess the product development expense adjustment consistent with prior years' rulings, subject to the assessee furnishing appropriate substantiation. The order of the lower authorities on foreign exchange losses was affirmed, while the product development expenses adjustment was remanded for reconsideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.