Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The HC directed the 2nd and 3rd Respondents to process the Petitioner's MEIS applications related to 174 shipping bills expeditiously, mandating completion within six weeks from the order's upload. The court held that technological or systemic glitches do not justify denial or undue delay in granting benefits under government export promotion schemes. Citing precedent, the HC emphasized that digital systems must facilitate, not hinder, lawful entitlements, and that any delays caused by electronic system inadequacies are impermissible. The Respondents were further ordered to communicate their decisions within the stipulated timeframe. The petition was accordingly disposed of.
The HC directed the 2nd and 3rd Respondents to process the Petitioner's MEIS applications related to 174 shipping bills expeditiously, mandating completion within six weeks from the order's upload. The court held that technological or systemic glitches do not justify denial or undue delay in granting benefits under government export promotion schemes. Citing precedent, the HC emphasized that digital systems must facilitate, not hinder, lawful entitlements, and that any delays caused by electronic system inadequacies are impermissible. The Respondents were further ordered to communicate their decisions within the stipulated timeframe. The petition was accordingly disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.